Chris,
Did you not have a 2200 before the 2400? For digital negatives, is
there any advantage to the 2400?
Sandy
>OHMAGOSH john,
>The 2400 is wonderful. I just finished printing my 10th and final
>13x19 negative and ran out of ink on one of the cartridges....and
>I've printed 9 of those negs in palladium and the ink is extremely
>dense, except for the black ink which is less dense than the 2200.
>However, I am not using black ink, only colored inks. So, as far as
>I am concerned, the printer is PERFECT (except for the price--$800).
>Chris
>
>>Chris,
>>I read somewhere recently that pigment inks as on the R2400
>>function much less satisfactorily than dye based inks for digital
>>negatives. For this reason I was going to hang onto my 1290 for the
>>time being, to dedicate to transparency printing. As a newbie to
>>alternative processes, I was wondering what the concensus of the
>>forum was on this subject
>>John Fontana
Received on Sun Apr 9 17:00:00 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 05/01/06-11:10:24 AM Z CST