On Apr 4, 2006, at 9:22 PM, Sandy King wrote:
> Judy,
>
> Regardless of the proof anyone might cite, I am certain that the  
> same top to bottom hardening that we see in carbon is also the  
> primary mechanism for colloid hardening in gum.
AFAIK, it has hardly been "established" that gum hardening occurs at  
the paper surface, as Judy suggested, but it's also interesting that  
Sandy is so certain that hardening occurs from top down that he  
claims he will remain certain, no matter what proof is offered. :--)   
I myself am waiting for further evidence to illuminate the issue.
In the past,  the "proof" that has been offered here for hardening at  
the paper surface is no proof at all but Mike Ware's speculation that  
the dichromate may be strongly absorbed  to the paper;  he thinks it   
may move down through the layer  and congregate at the paper  
surface,  and if this is  so,  that is where hardening would take  
place, because that is where the bulk of the dichromate would be  
found.  But it's just a hypothesis, and he has offered no evidence  
that I know of  to support  this hypothesis.
But  one thing that makes me doubt the top-down theory is the tonal  
inversion thing, where it is apparent that some minimal exposure  
leaves enough hardened gum  to resist pigment stain,  even when the  
exposure is so inadequate that the gum layer as a whole fails to  
harden and dissolves off the paper, seemingly in its entirety.
So, as far as I'm concerned, the jury is still out.
Katharine
Received on Wed Apr  5 08:03:20 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 05/01/06-11:10:23 AM Z CST