Re: 55 minute download

From: steves ^lt;sgshiya@redshift.com>
Date: 09/01/04-10:10:18 PM Z
Message-id: <004d01c490a3$5ae5dfe0$1d04e4d8@am.sony.com>

This certainly makes the case for those one megibite cameras that cost some
$60- 90.

S.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Etienne Garbaux" <photographeur@softhome.net>
To: <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 9:01 PM
Subject: Re: 55 minute download

> Gordon sagely wrote:
>
> > I disagree with Sandy. Why should I force people to buy into services
> > they don't need just because people can't follow directions?
>
> > What if there were numerous image files sent everyday? What if people
> > replied to messages with large image files and sent the image files
> > back and forth.
>
> The overhead in reply messages alone in which the reply-er forgot to
delete
> the attachment would sink the list.
>
> > Are people willing to pay for the cost attachments would incur? I
> > would assume not. The choices are:
>
> > no attachments with free archiving
> > attacments with a subscription fee and an advertising backed archive
> > attachments and no archive.
>
> If we are being invited to vote, here's mine: TEXT ONLY. NO HTML. NO
> ATTACHMENTS.
>
> Best regards,
>
> etienne
>
Received on Wed Sep 1 22:11:56 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 10/01/04-09:17:54 AM Z CST