Re: 55 minute download

From: Jan Kapoor ^lt;jkapoor@jankapoor.net>
Date: 09/01/04-04:53:30 PM Z
Message-id: <413652EA.8070805@jankapoor.net>

That's nice, but in my area I can't get high speed internet; dialup is
it for me and it is normally workable. I thought there were rules
against sending huge image files?

Jan

Sandy King wrote:

>
>
> With regard to Ryuji's comments about the "unsubscribe" requests, I
> don't really believe he is that naive.
>
> But what is the big deal about the attachments? They downloaded on my
> system in less than two seconds. If your ISP requires 5 - 55 minutes
> it might be time to consider changing provider and joining the rest of
> us in the 21st century. Just a thought.
>
> Sandy
>
>
>
>
>> From: Katharine Thayer <kthayer@pacifier.com>
>> Subject: Re: 55 minute download
>> Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2004 10:47:49 +0000
>>
>>> Heck, why would they see the instructions not to send attachments
>>> any more than they see the instructions about how to unsubscribe?
>>
>>
>> For some reason I always thought that those deliberately
>> misdirected/misformatted unsubscribe requests are signals that tell
>> "we've had this thread for long enough."
>>
>> --
>> Ryuji Suzuki
>> "You have to realize that junk is not the problem in and of itself.
>> Junk is the symptom, not the problem."
>> (Bob Dylan 1971; source: No Direction Home by Robert Shelton)
>
>
>

-- 
Fine art photography of Jan Kapoor at www.jankapoor.net
Pinhole, large format, alternative printing processes and digital.
Received on Wed Sep 1 16:53:44 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 10/01/04-09:17:54 AM Z CST