Re: Judy Seigel Ruined My Day!

From: steves ^lt;sgshiya@redshift.com>
Date: 05/16/04-09:59:10 AM Z
Message-id: <001101c43b5e$c0492440$3c04e4d8@am.sony.com>

Gosh, I got my copy a day late, and all those short dollars, too. Aren't we
gonna get a number 10? Pleeeease!!!

S.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Judy Seigel" <jseigel@panix.com>
To: <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
Sent: Saturday, May 15, 2004 4:26 PM
Subject: Re: Judy Seigel Ruined My Day!

>
> I'm trying to think of a way to explain how thrilled I am to have had this
> effect, which suggests that at least some of the material in #9 was as
> compelling & seductive to at least some folks as it seemed to me, while at
> the same time not give the impression that I am an unsympathetic person,
> or worse yet, narcissistically oblivious to the suffering of others. When
> I think of something suitably self-deprecating, I'll send it along,
> meanwhile it occurs to me that these complaints do prove the superiority,
> for the purpose of a "magazine," of print over online publication. There
> is no way on this earth you can blame a day lost to an online "magazine"
> on a morning surprise from the mailman !
>
> For that insight, as well as the list of seductions, I thank Mark and John
> especially. Somehow I'd thought folks were most interested in
> technical/how to -- and the anecdotal (gossipy?) was to please myself.
> Glad to have been of service.
>
>
> Judy
>
Received on Sun May 16 21:54:09 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 06/04/04-01:20:53 PM Z CST