Re: extremely off topic

From: Patricia Reed ^lt;preed@kumc.edu>
Date: 11/19/03-05:01:34 PM Z
Message-id: <sfbba1fd.013@kumc-smtpout.kumc.edu>

I guess an x-ray is more a diagnostic tool and not as personal as say a
photograph of someone's skin cancer, but still that was an image of your
daughter and it was used by her for fun not for profit .

>>> Ender100@aol.com 11/19/2003 4:40:12 PM >>>
My daughter had an MRI of her skull/brain made into a t-shirt. I
think she
wore it when she defended her doctoral thesis.... just to make sure
they would
know she had a brain...

Mark Nelson

In a message dated 11/19/03 4:31:05 PM, preed@kumc.edu writes:

> I am wanting to use some medical images, x-rays,
> for some alt processes to put in a show. But I don't know anything
> about the ethics of this.
> The people in the x-rays will be in no way be recognizable and their
> names will not be included.
> The x-rays will be altered by me thru the process of making enlarged
> negatives and being printed in cyano or something.
> They will no longer be x-rays made by a radiologist but appropriated
> and altered by me into something else, my own art.?
> So does any one know of a reference resource of guidelines for using
> medical images in art?
>
Received on Wed Nov 19 17:01:59 2003

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 12/04/03-05:18:03 PM Z CST