Re: OH, HECK! And Heck Specks!

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Richard Knoppow (dickburk@ix.netcom.com)
Date: 06/11/01-12:17:48 AM Z

Next message: bmaxey1@juno.com: "Re: OH, HECK! And Heck Specks!"
Previous message: Jean Burdett: "re: I'll think of it in a minute"
In reply to: Steve Shapiro: "Re: OH, HECK! And Heck Specks!"
Next in thread: Steve Shapiro: "Re: OH, PICTURE HECK! And Heck Specks!"
Reply: Steve Shapiro: "Re: OH, PICTURE HECK! And Heck Specks!"
Reply: Brian Ellis: "Re: OH, HECK! And Heck Specks!"

At 07:49 PM 06/10/2001 -0700, you wrote:
>Oh! The latest flap I LIKE is 'Diplomatic Imunity and properties are
>sacrosanct.'
>
>NO!
>
>Diplomatic attachment to our country, especially, is valid only so long as
>the diplomats act with diplomacy.
>
>Sounds contrary? Justly so! A French diplomat was stopped for driving while
>under the influence and claimed Diplomatic immunity. NO! He got 6 months
>for DUI and negligent contest, too.
>
He should have claimed dipsomaniac imunity.

----
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles,Ca.
dickburk@ix.netcom.com

Next message: bmaxey1@juno.com: "Re: OH, HECK! And Heck Specks!"
Previous message: Jean Burdett: "re: I'll think of it in a minute"
In reply to: Steve Shapiro: "Re: OH, HECK! And Heck Specks!"
Next in thread: Steve Shapiro: "Re: OH, PICTURE HECK! And Heck Specks!"
Reply: Steve Shapiro: "Re: OH, PICTURE HECK! And Heck Specks!"
Reply: Brian Ellis: "Re: OH, HECK! And Heck Specks!"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 07/12/01-11:41:54 AM Z CST