[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: What is pee oh are en?
Stone?
This warrants an avalanche.
> And the Lord said
>
> "Let him without sin cast the first stone".
>
> The End?
>
> Mark.
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <Jenfieldny@aol.com>
> To: <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2000 6:01 PM
> Subject: Re: What is pee oh are en?
>
>
>>
>> In a message dated 10/24/00 5:51:18 PM, pam_pine@cape.com writes:
>>
>> << I'd suggest that those who have had extramarital affairs should excuse
>> themselves from judging others who've been so accused. This advice if
>> followed,
>> of course, would have precluded Congress from meeting a quorum call. And I
> do
>> understand all the ins and outs of the difference between being accused of
>> lying
>> under oath and having an affair. If I choose to summarize Hyde's
> participation
>> in what's intended to be a somewhat humorous way, that's my choice. Who
> can
>> take
>> these people seriously? I just want them out of my life, an apparently
>> impossible goal. unfortuantely, they are the only ones that will stand up
> to
>> the idiotic way we seem to vote people into office
>>
>> I'd also suggest that you drop into name calling a little too hastily and
> with
>> incomplete knowledge. You may want to rethink the position that just
> because
>> someone may or may not have paid attention to the impeachment proceedings
>> (talk
>> about a major time waster, right up there with OJ), s/he is a yokel.
> agree
>> 100%!!! boring!! boring!!! boring!!
>>>>
>> And Judy blurts, "he had a problem. Either financial abuse or peophilia."
>>> PEDOPHILIA???!!! Judy, you should be ashamed. His "problem" was an
> affair
>>> he had with a married woman thirty years ago. i would say it is a
>> "problem" when you are accusing others - otherwise it is no one's business
>> what people do behind closed doors, now is it!
>> Jill
>>
>