Re: Scans

• To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
• Subject: Re: Scans
• From: Judy Seigel <jseigel@panix.com>
• Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 13:26:15 -0400 (EDT)
• Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
• In-reply-to: <B61464DD.5217%illovich@home.com>
• Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca

On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, illovich wrote:

> > Jack, don't you know you tempt fate when you say that? (Or maybe scanners
> > are nicer to you.)  However the Powerlook is the one I'm finding fine --
> > 2100XL, large bed with transparency adapter. Replaces the Mirage 2SE, the
> > scanner from hell.
> 
> I can also vouch for the 2100XL, which I've been using for the past couple
> months or so. Forget large negatives...we've gotten decent results scanning
> 8mm film stills.
> 

Well, here's tempting fate again -- due to a slide scanner kerfluffle, I
scanned most of the 35 mm photos for Post-Factory #5 on the Powerlook
flatbed with transparency top. True, repro was small & B&W, but even
so...

Judy

• References:
  • Re: Scans
    • From: illovich <illovich@home.com>

• Prev by Date: Re: Scanning Services - Denver???
• Next by Date: PC or not PC
• Prev by thread: Re: Scans
• Next by thread: Re: Scans
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread