Richard Sullivan (richsul@earthlink.net)
Tue, 29 Jun 1999 09:42:50 -0600
First off I am not a lawyer but have consulted with them on this issue over 
the years.
Negligence and damages are two necessary elements to be proven in a law 
suit. As to the issue of negligence, how a firm advertises and targets its 
product audience is crucial. Also the nature of the product is an issue. 
Bay City Cranes have one audience and Big Wheel Tricycles have another.
For instance, in the audio and Hi-Fi industry you may note that there is a 
distinct dividing line between "professional" gear and "consumer" gear. 
Some companies even go so far as to have two distinct divisions with 
different names like Teac (consumer) and Tascam (professional.) It is often 
not even a matter of price or quality as some consumer gear can cost 
thousands more than some the professional gear although the professional 
gear is usually more expensive.
One main difference is that pro gear generally is built on a "floating" 
ground and this avoids having your recording studio put the local radio 
station on every recording. Floating grounds are more dangerous. It is 
expected that professional users won't do the same dumb things that 
consumers might do so you are generally protected. Even the connectors on 
the back are different to help keep the units from being in mixed company. 
Pro gear has BNC connectors and consumer has RCA.
This is one of the main reasons the big chemical companies don't sell to 
"consumers." If I buy 100 kilos of potassium chlorate and end up accidently 
making La Bomba Grande in my back room, I am going to have a hell of a time 
convincing a jury that Mallinkrodt was negligent in selling it to me. Some 
16 year old boy who wants to make his own fireworks and buys some potassium 
chlorate is going to give his parents a real nice reason for a big law suit.
By the same token if you make and sell photographs you are a professional 
and have less cause. If you are a casual shooter shooting slides on your 
vacation you are a notch below the photographer with a darkroom.
In general (and it's quite a generality) alt-photographers by the nature of 
alt-photography have a somewhat higher expectation of expertise that the 
run-of-the-mill amateur photography.
I've sat in the middle and watched the tightening of the restrictions to 
access to chemicals over the last two decades. Some countries are getting 
freakier and freakier over anything chemical being shipped to them. Even 
though there are strict international standards now over what is Hazmat and 
what isn't individual customs agents and offices will make there own 
determination. Ferric oxalate trips them up all the time as it is not 
listed as Hazmat but also does not appear in any catalog. It just plain is 
not listed and for that reason it freaks them out. It gets weirder with 
pre-packaged kits like Van Dyke and gum. We've had potassium ferricyanide 
held up because they thought it was plain old cyanide.
Sometimes things that are normally harmless like phosphoric acid are 
restricted due to the fact that they corrode aluminum and UPS does not want 
its planes dissolving in mid-air. This makes a lot of sense.
99% goes through without a hitch, it's just fighting for the last one 
percent that get snagged along the way is a pain. If there is a 25 ml 
bottle of 1% ammonium dichromate in a big shipment that is causing concern, 
the whole shipment gets held up. There is little that we can do if it is 
held up in French or Nigerian customs. That has to be dealt with by 
recipient who then gets us writing letters explaining the nature of the 
chemicals etc.
Oh and there is the periodic 100 gm bottle that gets snagged because it 
exceeds the weight limit for a certain chemical because the UPS shipping 
clerk does not know the difference between kilograms and grams
It is a multifaceted problem and if things keep going the way they have for 
the last two decades, we don't have a lot of time left.
--Dick Sullivan
505-474-0890 FAX 505-474-2857
<http://www.bostick-sullivan.com>http://www.bostick-sullivan.com
http://www.workingpictures.com  
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu Oct 28 1999 - 21:39:38