DanPhoto@aol.com
Fri, 28 May 1999 15:32:32 -0400 (EDT)
The Symbolic Sciences Lightjet is a terrific printer. In fact, the color 
calibration print that comes with the second edition of my book, "Making 
Digital Negatives for Contact Printing," was produced on a Lightjet. Take 
a loupe to the print and you see a beautiful "photographic" look.
Good operators say that resolutions for lightjet output should be above 
200 ppi for best output, but they add that they've seen files as low as 
100ppi produce good prints. Yes, indeed the resolution requirements are 
lower than for imagesetter negatives, particularly those using a 
linescreen which is less efficient (per ppi) in rendering detail than a 
stochastic negative.
Keep in mind the issue of cost. Many labs quote prices of $15-$25 for an 
8 x 10 print. Considering that they usually charge 20% to 50% more for 
output to the Duraclear or Duratrans material (what you'd use for 
negatives), and you're starting to talk real money for each neg.
On the other hand, yesterday I got back from my service bureau six 
imagesetter negatives that cost a total of $28. That's an attractive 
price to a do-it-on-a-shoestring guy like me! 
Another issue for UV printers is stability. Remember that the Lightjet 
"image" is a dye cloud structure, whereas an imagesetter negative is 
silver-based. Some accelerated aging tests might be a good idea on the 
Lightjet output before committing lots of time and output to that 
material.
It will be interesting to see how this changing technology makes our 
traditional printing easier and better! And as Lightjet output prices 
fall, it offers a real alternative for contact printers!
Dan
In your email you stated...
>From:	beakman@netcom.com (Beakman)
>Reply-to:	alt-photo-process-l@skyway.usask.ca
>To:	alt-photo-process-l@skyway.usask.ca
>Many people e-mail me asking for a good source for digital negatives.  I 
>was just in L.A. yesterday visiting with Muse-X (www.epsdigital.com).  
>They can make digital negs for platinum printing using their LightJet 
>5000.  Though I have not seen or tried these negs myself, they should be 
>very much like continous tone negs -- i.e. the LightJet does not use a 
>linescreen.  Also, I think you'd be able to get by with smaller image 
>files.  You can call them at: 213.874.6141  ask for Dave Luckenbill and 
>tell him that David Fokos sent you.
>
>Best of luck,
>David Fokos
>
>p.s. their website says that they will actually make platinum prints, but 
>this is a mistake, they don't.
>
>
>
>
>----------------------- Headers --------------------------------
>Return-Path: <alt-photo-process-error@skyway.usask.ca>
>Received: from  rly-ya05.mx.aol.com (rly-ya05.mail.aol.com 
>[172.18.144.197]) by air-ya05.mail.aol.com (v59.24) with SMTP; Fri, 28 May 
>1999 13:38:42 -0400
>Received: from  skybat.usask.ca (skybat.usask.ca [128.233.1.27]) by 
>rly-ya05.mx.aol.com (vx) with SMTP; Fri, 28 May 1999 13:38:33 -0400
>Received: from process.sask.usask.ca by sask.usask.ca (PMDF V5.2-31 #35001)
> id <01JBQ9PP5PWW9I5P57@sask.usask.ca> (original mail from 
>beakman@netcom.com)
> ; Fri, 28 May 1999 11:37:52 CST
>Received: from CONVERSION-DAEMON by sask.usask.ca (PMDF V5.2-31 #35001)
> id <01JBQ9POPG349I5R7W@sask.usask.ca> for
> alt-photo-process-l-expand@process.sask.usask.ca
> (ORCPT rfc822;alt-photo-process-l@skyway.usask.ca); Fri,
> 28 May 1999 11:37:36 -0600 (CST)
>Received: from netcom11.netcom.com (netcom11.netcom.com [192.100.81.121])
> by sask.usask.ca (PMDF V5.2-31 #35001)
> with ESMTP id <01JBQ9PNUYUS9I5QOI@sask.usask.ca> for
> alt-photo-process-l-expand@process.sask.usask.ca
> (ORCPT rfc822;alt-photo-process-l@skyway.usask.ca); Fri,
> 28 May 1999 11:37:36 -0600 (CST)
>Received: (from >Received: (from beakman@localhost)
> by netcom11.netcom.com (8.8.5-r-beta/8.8.5/(NETCOM v1.02))
> id KAA06055	for alt-photo-process-l@skyway.usask.ca; Fri,
> 28 May 1999 10:37:29 -0700 (PDT)
>Date: Fri, 28 May 1999 10:37:28 -0700 (PDT)
>From: Beakman <beakman@netcom.com>
>Subject: here's a source for digital negatives
>To: alt-photo-process-l@skyway.usask.ca
>Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@skyway.usask.ca
>Message-id: <199905281737.KAA06055@netcom11.netcom.com>
>MIME-version: 1.0
>X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25]
>Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
>Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
>Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu Oct 28 1999 - 21:39:35