Altview@aol.com
Tue, 18 May 1999 20:56:52 -0400 (EDT)
One of the truisms in photography when you ask someone what film and 
developer they use is that they all have the perfect formula that won't work 
for you. For everyone who thinks pyro is the photo god's gift to our medium, 
there are others who use something else with absolutely comparable results. 
The only way to achieve the results that work for the kind of imagery you are 
doing is to try several variations. Each film and each developer combination 
will all give perfectly acceptable results. Often the debates on the 
superiority of one combination over another is like discussing how many 
angels dance on the head of a pin. Sometimes the quality of the image 
supercedes the methodolgy of film processing. Sometimes the choice is about 
health and safety, one reason I choose not to use pyro. The potential and 
very real health risk is , for me, not worth any minute quality difference. 
Sometimes the choices come down to the price and availibilty of the film, not 
to which is superior. I too photograph with 12 X 20, among others, and have 
worked with both HP5 and Bergger film. I use HC-110 in dilutions B and E. 
These work for me. My advice is to use other people's suggestions as a point 
of departure, find a combination you like, and then work with it until you 
get what you are looking for. One disagreement I have with Carl's post is 
that 1 sheet at a time developing in a tray dramatically increases your 
chances of mottling and unevenness. 2 to 4 sheets at a time will give you 
much better and more even results. Just remember to lay them face or emulsion 
side down and while shuffling them through the stack, never pull them out 
from the bottom at a diagonal, as the sheets above will scratch. I routinely 
develop 12 X 20 and 14 X 17 with from between 4 to 8 sheets at a time with no 
scratches and perfect development. If you have any further questions about 
this or the camera, please feel free to contact directly.
Patrick Alt
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu Oct 28 1999 - 21:39:34