Richard Lahrson (tripspud@hooked.net)
Wed, 21 Apr 1999 21:18:25 -0700
Jonathan C Hall wrote:
> I am not against digital work it's damn fun and isn't that what photography should
> be about. If we are not having fun anymore we are missing the boat. In my opinion.
> P.S. no one as of yet can or has answer my question on length of time these inks
> for printers will last. I have to assume therefore that I am right. Archival
> Digital Prints (oxymoron)
Hi!
Why must the "end product" be a print? If (and still a large IF) one could
display an a photographic image on a computer screen that would equal, let us
say for comparison, the image quality of a projected Kodachrome transparency,
projected to the same size, this would certainly fill a hugh market. At this
point in time it has not been acheived. I will go out on the proverbial limb
and say that this may come to pass....
Cheers,
Rich Lahrson
tripspud@hooked.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu Oct 28 1999 - 21:39:32