--
\ Dwight Shackelford *=====*=====*=====*=====*=====*=====*=====*
=8{:) e-mule from Jack Ass-cii *=====*=====*=====*=====*=====*=====*
\ Visit my web page: http://www.hooked.net/~bubbha/whatsama.htm
*=====*=====*=====*=====*=====**=====*=====*=====*=====*=====*=====*
Date: Mon, 12 May 1997 10:13:03 -0700
From: Dwight Shackelford <bubbha@hooked.net>
Subject: Starting with Cyanotype
To: Alt Photo Process List <alt-photo-process-l@skyway.usask.ca>
Message-id: <33774F9F.4D8@hooked.net>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold (Win95; U)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
References: <9705121652.AA26562@mail1.halcyon.com>
OK folks. I'm considering doing cyanotype as my first venture into
alt-processes because it seems to be the least toxic. I've heard some
talk about density range of a negative, read Terry's post about density
ranges for different processes (great info) and am about to go to
Ireland to take pictures.
What I'm wondering is, how to I translate the negative density
information into exposure/development information so I can have some
workable negatives when I get back.
--
\ Dwight Shackelford *=====*=====*=====*=====*=====*=====*=====*
=8{:) e-mule from Jack Ass-cii *=====*=====*=====*=====*=====*=====*
\ Visit my web page: http://www.hooked.net/~bubbha/whatsama.htm
*=====*=====*=====*=====*=====**=====*=====*=====*=====*=====*=====*