Re: humidity and gum coating (was: Re: palladium bleeding once again
 
 
Yep, that sounds exactly like my method; just shows there's nothing  
new under the sun. Thanks for looking that up for me.
 
I did just try this with Arches bright white,  and it seemed to work  
fine (although for a while I didn't think it would, as the soluble  
coating in the beginning of development was coming off the less- 
exposed areas in a really ugly splotchy fashion).  But it wasn't a  
good test, really; I should have done it yesterday when the humidity  
was so low and I was having difficulty getting the coating to brush  
on smoothly. 
Katharine.
 
On Sep 2, 2006, at 6:29 PM, Venkatram Iyer wrote:
 To alleviate your distress, the text explains: 
 
Soak the paper in room temperature water (I dunked it in water,  
hung it till it stopped dripping). Place it on coating board,  
gently blot it till no visible water reflection is visible and  
apply the emulsion. You may not need to even out the coat with a  
hake. Dry in semidark or force dry with hairdryer set on cool. Best  
to expose after the coat dries. 
 
Hope this works.  Rajul 
 
 
On 2-Sep-06, at 5:16 PM, Katharine Thayer wrote: 
 
 
On Sep 2, 2006, at 4:22 PM, Venkatram Iyer wrote:
 
Christopher James in his book on Alternative Photographic  
Processes describes the wet coating technique on p. 235. I have  
tried it and it works really well.  Rajul 
 
 
Thanks, Rajul.  I just found out something distressing, though;  
when I went to dig James out of a box (I still don't have my books  
unpacked) I found that I don't have any of my alternative-process- 
related books with me.  That box must have gone into storage by  
accident, along with my statistics books. 
 
So does he basically recommend soaking the paper and blotting it  
before coating,  as I did, or is his wet-coating method something  
different than that? Thanks, 
Katharine 
 
 
 
 
 
On 2-Sep-06, at 8:23 AM, Katharine Thayer wrote:
 
Chris, this makes me wonder if anyone has ever tried humidifying  
paper for gum coating, to make the coating easier in dry  
climates.  The reason I'm wondering this is that my humidity,  
ordinarily  >90%,  has been way down for the last couple of days  
(17% yesterday afternoon) and I was having a heck of a time  
getting a smooth coat with my usual straight gum (no added  
water) mix.  I decided that if this keeps up (unlikely) I'll  
need to start adding water to the mix, but your troubles with  
palladium gave me to wonder if anyone has reported humidifying  
the paper to make the coating easier.  I do know that I once  
coated and printed on wet paper, just to see if it could be  
done, and it coated beautifully and printed fairly well, except  
for a sort of mottled effect in the background.  Here's the test  
print I posted at the time: 
 
http://www.pacifier.com/~kthayer/html/wetcoat.html 
 
At any rate,  that combined with your explorations around  
palladium have led me to musing about  whether humidifying might  
give a better result. 
 
 
Katharine 
 
 
On Sep 1, 2006, at 10:10 PM, Christina Z. Anderson wrote: 
 
 
 
Well, 
 
Happy Labor Day weekend everyone!  It may be a true "labor"  
weekend for this 
household after all, because my daughter is having her baby in  
my bathtub 
any day (or hour) now.  Hmmm...that sounds strange....we do  
have hospitals 
in MT....ohhhh, never mind... 
 
At least I got somewhere today with the bleeding issue.  My  
Platine shipment 
came in and I was ever so excited to see if the new batch would  
be different 
and not bleed.  Alas...it still bled like crazy. 
 
SO, it helped that Mark Nelson said that at the Formulary (also in 
MT--similar humidity) they had to do two things to get good  
prints on Cot 
320 this summer:  humidify 30 minutes before coating and 30  
minutes after. 
 
I've watched the humidity all summer and it has hovered around  
30%. 
 
I messed around with the humidity and Everclear variables-- 
using Everclear 
or not, humidifying before and not after coating, humidifying  
after and not 
before coating, humidifying both before and after.  I built  
myself a 
makeshift humidity box with a couple of trays and stuck a gauge  
in there, 
too. 
 
(Of course in the meantime throughout these tests I am racing  
first to the 
hardware store for screening and then to the liquor store for  
my flask of 
Everclear...I thought of downing the bottle on my way home.) 
 
What I found was it was most important to humidify after  
coating, more 
important than Everclear or having the paper humidified  
before.  If I 
humidified before coating, the paper tone was greyer and  
duller.  If I 
humidified after coating, for 30 minutes (70% humidity) while  
the paper was 
drying, there was no bleeding. So it must be as Clay suggested-- 
the stuff is 
drying too quickly on the paper surface and not sinking in  
enough.  It was 
so bad on a couple of my test sheets tonight that I could  
literally take my 
finger, wipe the wet surface of the print, and have black  
stains on my 
fingertip.  I was losing quite a bit of density in the print  
all over, 
including highlights, and even had serious staining/bleeding  
into the 
highlight area, too. 
 
So tomorrow I am going to have to develop a new set of curves  
with this 
after-coating humidity factor, and will continue this procedure  
to see if, 
in fact, the bleeding completely stops.  I just have to find  
someone to 
build me a drying/humidity rack, now.... 
 
I'm still puzzled, though, why during the last couple years I  
never 
experienced this, and now I do.  If someone has a friend at  
Arches, could 
you ask if their paper sizing has changed in the last year? 
 
BTW, that green ink on the Epson 2400 is sure as heck dense. 
 
The end. 
Chris 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 |